1.0Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologiahttps://www.rbojournal.org/en/rich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="JjPUzjSaDe"><a href="https://www.rbojournal.org/en/peer-review-policy/">Peer Review Policy  </a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.rbojournal.org/en/peer-review-policy/embed/#?secret=JjPUzjSaDe" width="600" height="338" title="“Peer Review Policy  ” — Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia" data-secret="JjPUzjSaDe" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script type="text/javascript"> /* <![CDATA[ */ /*! This file is auto-generated */ !function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document); //# sourceURL=https://www.rbojournal.org/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js /* ]]> */ </script> Peer Review Policy   The Brazilian Journal of Ophthalmology (RBO) adopts the double-blind review model, with anonymity guaranteed throughout the judgment process (blind review). The objectives of the review: Identify errors or problems that make publication unfeasible. Help detect plagiarism, self-plagiarism, redundant publication and other forms of misconduct. Contribute to the improvement of the manuscript. Follow the ethical principles in publication recommended by the COPE. Issue considerations in accordance with the Instructions to Authors, which must be done in a [...]