<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" dtd-version="1.1" specific-use="sps-1.9" article-type="case-report" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rbof</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Rev. bras.oftalmol.</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0034-7280</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1982-8551</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia</publisher-name></publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37039/1982.8551.20260039</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1982.8551.20260039</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Case Report</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Spontaneous extrusion of a Müller sphere 30 years after evisceration</article-title>
<trans-title-group xml:lang="pt">
<trans-title>Extrusão espontânea de esfera de Müller 30 anos após evisceração</trans-title>
</trans-title-group>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0009-0003-3674-2460</contrib-id>
<name><surname>Budib</surname><given-names>Camyla Lemos</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1"/>
<role>contributed to the study design</role>
<role>data analysis</role>
<role>writing</role>
<role>critical review of the manuscript</role>
<role>approved the final version and are responsible for its accuracy and integrity.</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0009-0002-8377-3254</contrib-id>
<name><surname>Guerra</surname><given-names>Jade Pinto de Queiroz</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role>contributed to the study design</role>
<role>data analysis</role>
<role>writing</role>
<role>critical review of the manuscript</role>
<role>approved the final version and are responsible for its accuracy and integrity.</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0003-4441-4304</contrib-id>
<name><surname>Moscovici</surname><given-names>Bernardo Kaplan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role>contributed to the methodological supervision</role>
<role>discussion of the results</role>
<role>critical review of the manuscript</role>
<role>approved the final version and are responsible for its accuracy and integrity.</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0003-2099-0323</contrib-id>
<name><surname>Barboza</surname><given-names>Guilherme Novoa Colombo</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role>contributed to the methodological supervision</role>
<role>discussion of the results</role>
<role>critical review of the manuscript</role>
<role>approved the final version and are responsible for its accuracy and integrity.</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-7573-885X</contrib-id>
<name><surname>Barboza</surname><given-names>Marcello Novoa Colombo</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role>contributed to the methodological supervision</role>
<role>discussion of the results</role>
<role>critical review of the manuscript</role>
<role>approved the final version and are responsible for its accuracy and integrity.</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-1599-0516</contrib-id>
<name><surname>Milanez</surname><given-names>Adriana Geremias Toni</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role>contributed to the clinical analysis</role>
<role>data interpretation</role>
<role>critical review of the content</role>
<role>approved the final version and are responsible for its accuracy and integrity.</role>
</contrib>
<aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<institution content-type="orgname">Hospital Oftalmológico Visão Laser</institution>
<addr-line>
<named-content content-type="city">Santos</named-content>
<named-content content-type="state">SP</named-content>
</addr-line>
<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
<institution content-type="original">Hospital Oftalmológico Visão Laser, Santos, SP, Brazil.</institution>
</aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1"><label>Corresponding author:</label> Camyla Lemos Budib E-mail: <email>camylaabudib@gmail.com</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="coi-statement"><label>Conflict of interest:</label><p>no conflict of interest</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><label>Associate editor:</label><p>Renato Wendell Ferreira Damasceno Universidade Estadual de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas, Maceió, AL, Brazil <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9380-0335">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9380-0335</ext-link></p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub">
<day>29</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2026</year></pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2026</year></pub-date>
<volume>85</volume>
<elocation-id>e0039</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>24</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>16</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright ©2026</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>The Author(s)</copyright-holder>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
<license-p>All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>We report a rare case of spontaneous extrusion of a Müller sphere implant three decades after ocular evisceration. A 44-year-old woman, with a history of evisceration of the left eye due to phthisis bulbi from congenital syphilis, presented with extrusion of an orbital implant. Surgical management consisted of reimplantation of a new sphere using a reconstructive technique with scleral shell and biological support. Postoperative recovery was favorable, and progressive prosthetic rehabilitation provided satisfactory functional and cosmetic outcomes. This case illustrates that orbital implant extrusion may occur even decades after surgery and highlights the importance of long-term follow-up in patients with ocular prostheses.</p>
</abstract>
<trans-abstract xml:lang="pt">
<title>RESUMO</title>
<p>Relatamos um caso raro de extrusão espontânea de uma esfera de Müller três décadas após evisceração ocular. Mulher de 44 anos, com histórico de evisceração do olho esquerdo por <italic>phthisis bulbi</italic> decorrente de sífilis congênita, apresentou extrusão de um implante orbitário. O tratamento cirúrgico consistiu na reimplantação de uma nova esfera utilizando técnica reconstrutiva com esclera e materiais biológicos de suporte. A recuperação pós-operatória foi favorável, e a reabilitação protética progressiva proporcionou resultados funcionais e estéticos satisfatórios. Este caso ilustra que a extrusão de implantes orbitários pode ocorrer mesmo décadas após a cirurgia e ressalta a importância do acompanhamento oftalmológico de longo prazo em pacientes com próteses oculares.</p>
</trans-abstract>
<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
<title>Keywords:</title>
<kwd>Eye evisceration</kwd>
<kwd>Eye, artificial</kwd>
<kwd>Orbital implants</kwd>
<kwd>Prosthesis failure</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<kwd-group xml:lang="pt">
<title>Descritores:</title>
<kwd>Evisceração ocular</kwd>
<kwd>Olho artificial</kwd>
<kwd>Implantes orbitários</kwd>
<kwd>Falha de prótese</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement><bold>Financial Support:</bold> no financial support for this work.</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="2"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="15"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>INTRODUCTION</title>
<p>Orbital implant extrusion represents one of the most concerning complications in orbital reconstructive surgery, with reported incidence in the literature ranging from 2 to 8%.<sup>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>)</sup> This complication typically manifests in the first years after surgery and is influenced by multiple factors, including implant characteristics, surgical technique employed, local cavity conditions, and host factors. Cases of late extrusion, especially those occurring after one or more decades, are extremely rare in the scientific literature, with most available reports describing complications in the first five postoperative years.<sup>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>)</sup></p>
<p>The Müller sphere, introduced in 1951, revolutionized anophthalmic socket treatment by utilizing polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) as a biocompatible material for orbital implantation. This non-porous spherical implant has been widely employed in recent decades, demonstrating excellent biocompatibility and satisfactory long-term aesthetic results.<sup>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>)</sup> However, its non-porous surface prevents true tissue integration, maintaining a mechanical interface that may weaken over time.</p>
<p>This report presents a rare case of spontaneous Müller sphere extrusion occurring 30 years after implantation, one of the longest intervals reported, and emphasizes the need for awareness of ultra-late complications.</p>
<p>This is a retrospective descriptive case report based on clinical data, surgical records, and photographic documentation of a patient treated at a tertiary eye care center in Brazil. Ethical approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Cuiabá (UNIC), under protocol 7,698,702 (CAAE: 88694125.0.0000.5165), in accordance with Resolution 466/12 and the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="cases">
<title>CASE REPORT</title>
<p>A 44-year-old female patient presented to the emergency eye care department with a seven-day history of moderate headache, associated with spontaneous extrusion of her left orbital implant upon awakening one day before presentation. She denied recent trauma, infection, or inappropriate manipulation of the ocular prosthesis.</p>
<p>Her medical history included congenital syphilis diagnosed in childhood, which had progressed with bilateral ocular involvement, more severe in the left eye. She developed interstitial keratitis, chronic uveitis, and progressive optic atrophy, culminating in phthisis bulbi at the age of 14. At that time, she underwent evisceration of the left eye with primary implantation of a Müller sphere, according to the standard surgical technique of the period. Records indicated preservation of the posterior sclera with direct placement of the implant into the scleral shell.</p>
<p>The patient maintained regular ophthalmologic follow-up during the first postoperative years, adapting well to a conventional ocular prosthesis. No complications were documented during the first 15 years. Over time, she progressively reduced her consultations, and the last recorded visit had been approximately 15 years prior to presentation. During this interval, she reported progressive loss of prosthetic retention, requiring more frequent replacements, but no episodes of acute inflammation or trauma. Her systemic history was significant only for controlled arterial hypertension.</p>
<p>Ophthalmologic evaluation revealed a normal right eye with best corrected visual acuity of 20/20 and no abnormalities on slit-lamp or fundus examination. The left eye had no light perception. External examination showed mild upper eyelid ptosis and absence of the prosthesis. Ectoscopy demonstrated a central opening of approximately 8 mm in the conjunctiva corresponding to the extrusion site, with clear serous secretion and no acute inflammatory signs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Figures 1A</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">1B</xref>). The conjunctival fornices were shortened, and orbital volume appeared reduced. Palpation confirmed the absence of any retained implant material. No orbital masses or regional lymphadenopathy were detected.</p>
<fig id="f1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><title>Left eye ectoscopy. (A, B) Preoperative aspect: orbital cavity with central opening (extrusion point) and signs of atrophic process. (C, D) Seventh postoperative day: orbital cavity with good appearance and well-coaptated conjunctival sutures.</title></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="0034-7280-rbof-85-e0039-gf01.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Following a multidisciplinary discussion involving the oculoplastic surgeon and prosthetist, surgical reconstruction was indicated with the goals of restoring orbital volume, reinforcing the structural support, and preparing the socket for future prosthetic rehabilitation. Under local anesthesia with sedation, careful dissection of scar tissue was performed, preserving remaining extraocular muscles when identifiable. A 16mm-Müller-sphere was selected based on socket volume and implanted into the scleral shell. Donor sclera, previously prepared according to tissue bank protocols, was used to cover the sphere and sutured to the conjunctival remnants with absorbable material. An additional scleral shell was placed as reinforcement, and a temporary conformer was positioned to maintain socket shape. Hemostasis was adequate, and the procedure was completed without complications.</p>
<p>Postoperative recovery was favorable. At one week, the socket appeared healthy with intact, well-apposed conjunctival sutures and no signs of infection or extrusion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Figures 1C</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">1D</xref>). At three months, the patient was referred for prosthetic adaptation, initiating progressive fornix expansion with gradual conformer adjustments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figures 2A</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">2B</xref>). At 6 months, she demonstrated excellent cosmetic and functional results with a stable, well-adapted prosthesis, complete absence of pain, and high satisfaction with the aesthetic outcome (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figures 2C</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">2D</xref>). The patient reported marked improvement in self-esteem and quality of life, successfully resuming her professional and social activities. She remains under regular follow-up in the oculoplastic service in collaboration with the prosthetist.</p>
<fig id="f2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><title>Left eye ectoscopy. (A, B) Three months postoperative: fornix dilatation for new prosthesis adaptation. (C, D) Six months postoperative: patient using ocular prosthesis, still undergoing fornix dilatation process.</title></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="0034-7280-rbof-85-e0039-gf02.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion">
<title>DISCUSSION</title>
<p>This case represents an exceptional contribution to ophthalmic literature by documenting spontaneous Müller sphere extrusion three decades after evisceration. Orbital implant extrusion typically occurs early: up to 78% of cases arise within the first two postoperative years, most between 6 and 18 months, while late events beyond five years account for only 8% of reports.<sup>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>)</sup> Ultra-late cases are extremely rare, with scattered descriptions of alloplastic orbital implant extrusions between 10 and 17 years,<sup>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>)</sup> and one report of silicone extrusion after 30 years in orbital fracture repair.<sup>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>)</sup> Our report therefore establishes one of the longest intervals documented for a PMMA Müller implant, emphasizing the importance of awareness regarding ultra-late complications.</p>
<p>Multiple host- and implant-related factors likely contributed to this rare outcome. Tissue aging progressively alters conjunctival collagen, with reduced type I collagen synthesis, increased metalloproteinase activity, and loss of elasticity, compromising long-term coverage.<sup>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>)</sup> PMMA, unlike porous materials, does not allow true tissue integration, leaving a mechanical interface that may weaken over time.<sup>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>)</sup> Continuous prosthesis movement can generate cumulative microtrauma, analogous to wear in other long-standing prosthetic devices,<sup>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>)</sup> while hormonal changes such as menopause may further impair conjunctival quality.<sup>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>)</sup></p>
<p>In this patient, congenital syphilis likely added susceptibility. Chronic vasculopathy and microcirculation involvement may reduce repair capacity, while subclinical inflammation can promote collagen degradation, weakening tissue integrity.<sup>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>)</sup> Discontinuity of ophthalmologic follow-up for 15 years further aggravated risk, since progressive socket contraction and volume loss may have gone unmonitored.<sup>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>)</sup> Although PMMA implants are biocompatible, they require adequate tissue coverage for stability, and reimplantation success depends largely on socket reconstruction and rehabilitation protocols.<sup>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>)</sup></p>
<p>The surgical approach in this case incorporated modern strategies, using biological reinforcement to optimize integration. Donor sclera offers excellent biocompatibility and remodeling capacity, providing a collagen scaffold for cellular migration and vascularization.<sup>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>)</sup> Layered reconstruction with implant, sclera, and scleral lens distributes tension more evenly and reduces focal pressure points, improving long-term stability. This method, combined with staged prosthetic rehabilitation –including conformer use, fornix expansion, and customized prosthesis – ensured both functional and cosmetic success.</p>
<p>This case highlights critical preventive and management lessons. Patients with orbital implants should undergo lifelong ophthalmologic follow-up, even in the absence of symptoms, and be educated about warning signs such as prosthetic instability or discharge. Spontaneous Müller sphere extrusion after 30 years underscores that ultra-late complications remain possible. With modern reconstructive techniques and a multidisciplinary approach, reimplantation can achieve excellent results, restoring both socket integrity and patient quality of life.</p>
<p>Spontaneous extrusion of a Müller sphere implant three decades after evisceration represents an extremely rare event in ophthalmology. This case emphasizes that ultra-late complications of PMMA implants may occur even after long periods of clinical stability, reinforcing the need for lifelong ophthalmologic follow-up in patients with orbital prostheses. Surgical reimplantation with biological reinforcement proved to be a safe and effective strategy, providing stable functional and cosmetic rehabilitation when combined with staged prosthetic adaptation and a multidisciplinary approach.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="financial-disclosure" id="fn1"><label>Financial support</label><p>no financial support for this work.</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn2"><label>Institution:</label><p>Hospital Oftalmológico Visão Laser, Santos, SP, Brazil.</p></fn>
</fn-group>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" specific-use="data-in-article">
<title>Data Availability Statement:</title>
<p>The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are included in the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>REFERENCES</title>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Manta</surname><given-names>AI</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Vu</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Enucleation and evisceration: a 10-year analysis of postoperative complications and sympathetic ophthalmia risk at a major Australian Tertiary Hospital, with a review of the current literature</article-title>
<source>Cureus</source>
<year>2025</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<elocation-id>e82646</elocation-id>
</element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Nguyen V, Manta AI, Vu P. Enucleation and evisceration: a 10-year analysis of postoperative complications and sympathetic ophthalmia risk at a major Australian Tertiary Hospital, with a review of the current literature. Cureus. 2025;17(4):e82646.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Jordan</surname><given-names>DR</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Klapper</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Complications and outcomes with 318 implants placed in the orbital cavity over 36 years</article-title>
<source>Orbit</source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>36</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>177</fpage>
<lpage>182</lpage>
</element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Jordan DR, Klapper SR. Complications and outcomes with 318 implants placed in the orbital cavity over 36 years. Orbit. 2017;36(3):177-82.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Müller</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Kugelfömige Glasprothesen bei der Behandlung von Augenhöhlenausräumungen</article-title>
<source>Klin Monbl Augenheilkd</source>
<year>1951</year>
<volume>118</volume>
<fpage>648</fpage>
<lpage>655</lpage>
</element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Müller G. Kugelfömige Glasprothesen bei der Behandlung von Augenhöhlenausräumungen. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1951;118:648-55.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Axmann</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Paridaens</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Anterior surface breakdown and implant extrusion following secondary alloplastic orbital implantation surgery</article-title>
<source>Acta Ophthalmol</source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>96</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>310</fpage>
<lpage>313</lpage>
</element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Axmann S, Paridaens D. Anterior surface breakdown and implant extrusion following secondary alloplastic orbital implantation surgery. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96(3):310-3.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Banks</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Late extrusion of alloplastic orbital floor implants</article-title>
<source>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>154</fpage>
<lpage>157</lpage>
</element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Brown MS, Banks JR. Late extrusion of alloplastic orbital floor implants. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;31(3):154-7.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yoon</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Late complication of a silicone implant thirty years after orbital fracture reconstruction</article-title>
<source>Arch Craniofac Surg</source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>137</fpage>
<lpage>140</lpage>
</element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Kim JH, Yoon JS. Late complication of a silicone implant thirty years after orbital fracture reconstruction. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2017;18(2):137-40.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Dave</surname><given-names>TV</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mishra</surname><given-names>DK</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mitragotri</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rao</surname><given-names>BS</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Novel histopathologic and immunohistochemical observations in explanted orbital peri-implant capsules</article-title>
<source>Curr Eye Res</source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>46</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>361</fpage>
<lpage>366</lpage>
</element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Dave TV, Mishra DK, Singh V, Kumar S, Mitragotri N, Rao BS. Novel histopathologic and immunohistochemical observations in explanted orbital peri-implant capsules. Curr Eye Res. 2021;46(3):361-6.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Karesh</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dresner</surname><given-names>SC</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>High-density porous polyethylene (Medpor) as a successful anophthalmic socket implant</article-title>
<source>Ophthalmology</source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>101</volume>
<issue>10</issue>
<fpage>1688</fpage>
<lpage>1695</lpage>
<comment>discussion 1695-6</comment>
</element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Karesh JW, Dresner SC. High-density porous polyethylene (Medpor) as a successful anophthalmic socket implant. Ophthalmology. 1994;101(10):1688-95; discussion 1695-6.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Massry</surname><given-names>GG</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Holds</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Posterior auricular fascia graft in socket reconstruction</article-title>
<source>Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg</source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>170</fpage>
<lpage>174</lpage>
</element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Massry GG, Holds JB. Posterior auricular fascia graft in socket reconstruction. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;17(3):170-4.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Schaumberg</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sullivan</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Buring</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dana</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Prevalence of dry eye syndrome among US women</article-title>
<source>Am J Ophthalmol</source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>136</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>318</fpage>
<lpage>326</lpage>
</element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Schaumberg DA, Sullivan DA, Buring JE, Dana MR. Prevalence of dry eye syndrome among US women. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136(2):318-26.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Aslan Katırcıoğlu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kaderli</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Şingar Özdemir</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Örnek</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Clinical results of the use of amniotic membrane transplantation alone or in combination with adjuvant therapies in conjunctival fornix reconstruction</article-title>
<source>Turk J Ophthalmol</source>
<year>2022</year>
<volume>52</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<fpage>237</fpage>
<lpage>245</lpage>
</element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Aslan Katırcıoğlu Y, Kaderli A, Şingar Özdemir E, Örnek F. Clinical results of the use of amniotic membrane transplantation alone or in combination with adjuvant therapies in conjunctival fornix reconstruction. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2022;52(4):237-45.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Perry</surname><given-names>AC</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Integrated orbital implants</article-title>
<source>Adv Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg</source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<fpage>75</fpage>
<lpage>81</lpage>
</element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Perry AC. Integrated orbital implants. Adv Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;8:75-81.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Serin</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Karslioglu</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Akbaba</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Buttanri</surname><given-names>IB</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fazil</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Clinical evaluation of 188 patients with contracted socket</article-title>
<source>Surgery: Curr Res</source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<issue>6</issue>
<fpage>209</fpage>
<lpage>209</lpage>
</element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Serin D, Karslioglu S, Akbaba M, Buttanri IB, Fazil K. Clinical evaluation of 188 patients with contracted socket. Surgery: Curr Res. 2014;4(6):209.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Su</surname><given-names>GW</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yen</surname><given-names>MT</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Current trends in managing the anophthalmic socket after primary enucleation and evisceration</article-title>
<source>Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg</source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<fpage>274</fpage>
<lpage>280</lpage>
</element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Su GW, Yen MT. Current trends in managing the anophthalmic socket after primary enucleation and evisceration. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;20(4):274-80.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Tawfik</surname><given-names>HA</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Raslan</surname><given-names>AO</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Talib</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Surgical management of acquired socket contracture</article-title>
<source>Curr Opin Ophthalmol</source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<issue>5</issue>
<fpage>406</fpage>
<lpage>411</lpage>
</element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Tawfik HA, Raslan AO, Talib N. Surgical management of acquired socket contracture. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20(5):406-11.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
