Rev Bras Oftalmol.2025;84:e0084

Cost-utility analysis of latanoprostene bunod eye drops in glaucoma treatment from the perspective of the Brazilian Unified Health System

Vanessa Fernandes , Ricardo Augusto Paletta , Alfredo

DOI: 10.37039/1982.8551.20250084

ABSTRACT

Objective:

To evaluate the cost-utility of latanoprostene bunod 0.024% as first-line therapy compared to the strategy recommended by the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines for primary open-angle glaucoma of the Brazilian Unified Health System.

Methods:

A cost-utility analysis was conducted using a hypothetical cohort and a Markov model. In the base-case scenario, the treatment strategy recommended by the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines was adopted, initiating therapy with timolol 0.5%. If the target intraocular pressure was not achieved, dorzolamide 2% and prostaglandin analogue were added. The comparator scenario considered latanoprostene bunod 0.024% as the initial treatment option, followed, when required, by the sequential addition of timolol 0.5% and dorzolamide 2%.

Results:

The model analysis showed a cost-utility ratio of BRL 31,244.98 per Quality-Adjusted Life-Years for the latanoprostene bunod 0.024% strategy compared to the Brazilian Unified Health System strategy. Age at model entry was the parameter with the greatest impact on cost-utility ratio, resulting in a range from BRL 24,953.82 to BRL 50,284.30 per Quality-Adjusted Life-Years.

Conclusion:

Both strategies provide gains in quality of life, and the incorporation of latanoprostene bunod 0.024% as a first-line medication for clinical management of primary open-angle glaucoma is considered cost-effective from the Brazilian Unified Health System perspective.

Cost-utility analysis of latanoprostene bunod eye drops in glaucoma treatment from the perspective of the Brazilian Unified Health System

Comments (0)